Mis National Aluminium Co. Ltd. v. Raj Kishore @ Sahu Jena and Anr.

Leave granted. Though notice was served on the respondents, no one has appeared for the first respondent-claimant. The controversy is no longer res-integra. They are covered by the judgment of this Court in UP. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad v. Gyan Devi (Dead) by Lrs. & Ors., JT (1994) 7 SC 304. In that view, the appellant being beneficiary is entitled to be impleaded as a party in the pending proceedings in the court of Subordinate Judge, Angul. The appeal is accordingly allowed. No costs. G.N. Appeal allowed. 306 ..