State of Rajasthan v. Seva Ram and Ors.

Mr. Medh, Advocate appears for respondent No. 1. Respondent F Nos. 2 and 3, though served, are not appearing either in person or through counsel. Leave granted. The controversy raised is covered by the order of this Court in C.A. G 3204/95 and batch dated 28.2.1995 wherein delay was condoned and mat- ters were remitted to the High Court for disposal along with the pending appeals for decision on merits. Accordingly, we set aside the order of the High Court and remit this matter to the High Court for disposal along with the pending appeals, if not already disposed of. 81 82 SUPREME COURT REPORTS · (1996) 2 S.C.R. . . \ . . . A. If they are disposed of, the ratio therein may gover~ the controversy in thi• appeal . . Appeal i• di•posed of in above terms. No costs. G.N. Appeal disposed of. . ' . ·.