LexDraft · Judgments

State of Orissa and Anr. v. Damodar Nayak and Anr.

Supreme Court of India · 1997 INSC 337 · 1997

Coram: K. RAMASWAMY, D.P. WADHWA

Source: sci_open_data

The report of the Registry indicates that the service is complete. However, the respondents are not appearing either in person or through F counsel. Leave granted. The question limited to the notice is : whether the respondent would be entitled to payment of salary under the Grant-in-Aid Scheme from the G date of initial appointment till he improved his qualification or from the date of his acquiring the qualification? The admitted position is that respondent No. 1 came to be appointed as a lecturer in 1976. The Govern­ ment issued clarification on January 5, 1987 that unqualified lectures having minimum second class, i.e., 48% or above and below 54% of marks in P.G. H examination and appointed on or after 1.8.1977 in recognised non-Govern- 456 I STATE v. DAMODAR NAY AK 457 I ment Colleges would be eligible to receive· grant-in-aid. The Resolution A dated September 13, 1983 issued by the Government prescribes the qualification for recruitment of .L'ecturers of affiliated Colleges which indicates that "candidate not holding an M. Phil degree should possess a high second Class Master's degree, i.e., 54% marks and a second class Honours/Pass in the B.A./B. ,Cpm./B:S~. examinafion.", Respondent No. 1 B secured 53.9% marks, ~hich is almost equivaleiit of 54% niarks, on March 21, 1989. Therefore, the. question arises : whether the second respoµdent is entitled tO receive grant~in-aid 0 for payirient of salary to the first respon- dent from the date of his acquiririg qualification or from the date of initial appointment? Admittedly, sl~ce the first respondent on the date of his appointment was not possessing the requisite qualification anci acquired c. the\ame only oh March 21, 1989 he will be eligible to th~ benefit of the. grant-in-aid w'.e.f. Apr1il, 1989 dnd onwards. . ·. . . . . . . . The appeal is accordingly allowed and the order of the High Court passed· on April 23, 1996 in OJC No. 3548/96, to that extent stands modified. No costs. · · · O· T.N.A. Appeal aJ.lowed. . . - ., i' i ' ,, ... .. 1 •• . i