Gen. Manager, M/S. Hutti Gold Mines Co. v. Shivappa (d) Thr. His Lrs. and Ors.
The Judgm<!nt of the Court was delivered by
DR. AR. LAKSHMANAN, J. 1. Heard Mr.Gopal Subramaniam, learned
ASG appearing on behalf of the appellant and Mr. Dhruv Mehta, learned
counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-claimants.
2. Leave granted.
3. This appeal is directed against the order passed by the High Court
of Karnataka in M.F.A.No.3707/2006 and other connected matters. The High
Court of Karnataka by order dt.11.01.2007 while admitting the appeals has
passed the following interim order:-
"This Court doth Order that pending admission of the above E
appeal the operation and execution of the impugned award in LAC
Nos. 1,2,31.3,4,32,5,6,7,33,34,8,35,37,9,10 of2001 dated 19.12.2006 and
LAC Nos.22,23, 13,24,17,26,18,27, 19, 14,28,20,29, 15m 30 of 200 I dated
03.01.2006 on the file of the Addi.Civil Judge (Sr.On.) Raichur is
hereby stayed subject to the appellant depositing 50% of the enhanced F
amounts along with the proportionate amounts towards solatium,
additional market value and the interest thereon within four weeks
from today i.e. 11.01.2007 with the reference Court. On such deposit
being made, it is open to the claimants to draw the same.".
4. Aggrieved against the direction to deposit 50% of the enhanced G
amount along with the proportionate amounts towards solatium, additional
market value and the interest thereon, the appellant through its General
_, Manager preferred the above Civil Appeal arising out ofSLP(C) No.2471/2007.
5. We have perused the grounds of appeal and also heard the arguments
advanced by learned ASIJ for the appellant and learned counsel for the H
806 SUPREME COURT REPORTS .[2007] 2 S.C.R.
A respondents. Since the appeal is pending before the High Court, we are not
expressing any opinion on the merits of the rival claims. However, in our
opinion, the order of the High Court ordering deposit of 50% of the enhanced
amount with liberty to withdraw needs modification. We, therefore, direct the
appellant herein to deposit 50% of the enhanced amount along with the
B proportionate amounts towards solatium, additional market value and the
interest thereon within four weeks from today with the Reference Court. On
such deposit, all the claimants are entitled to withdraw 25% of the enhanced
amount without furnishing any security. The Reference Court shall open a
separate account in respect of all the claimants and keep 25% of the remaining
amount in fixed deposit in a natior;ialised bank and await further orders from
C the High Court in the pending appeal. Since the acquisition proceedings
started in the year 1995 and the matter is pending in one forum or the other
we request the High Court to dispose of the appeals filed by the appellant
herein ar.d also the appeals filed by the respondents herein/claimants within
six months from today on merits and in accordance with law. We request the
Hon'ble Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court to place all the matters
D before a Division Bench of the said court for disposal of the same within the
time stipulated in this Order.
' 6. The appeal stands disposed of accordingly.
7. No costs.
B.B.B. Appeals disposed of.
'
J
L