Bandu v. State of Maharashtra
• MARKANDEY KAT JU, J. I. This appeal has been filed against the
impugned judgment & order of the High Court of Bombay in Criminal Appeal
No. 115of1996.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. E
3. In this case the appellant Bandu had been found guilty under Section
498-A of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment
for 2 years and a fine of Rs. 500/- by the trial court. However, on appeal by
the State Government as well as Bandu, the High Court while setting aside
F ::- the conviction of the appellant under Section 498A, held him guilty under
Section 302 !PC and convicted him to life imprisonment and a fine of Rs.
500/-.
4. According to the prosecution case PW6 Shanta Kotangale was married
to accused Bandu on 10.5.1985. After happy cohabitation for initial 12 months, G the parties started having differences. Accused Bandu used to say that he
-~
did not like Shanta and that she should go back to her parent's place. She
conceived, but continued to face ill-treatment. Eventually, her brother took her
to the parental house. She filed a petition for maintenance before the learned
Judicial Magistrate First Class Hinganghat, in which a compromise was reached
on 2.10.1990, and the parties resumed cohabitation. Thereafter she gave a H
A birth to a daughter, named Nita, at her parent's place. Accused Bandu brought ·-r-
back his wife and daughter to his matrimonial home. For a few days everything
was all right, but thereafter the accused started saying that Nita was not his
daughter and, therefore, he prevented Shanta from feeding Nita. On 1.1.1991
at about 3 A.M., when Shanta and accused Bandu were sleeping with their
daughter, the accused killed daughter Nita by pressing her neck and threw
Nita from the cot. Shanta started crying which attracted quite a crowd and
Pulgaon Police Station was informed about the incident. The police came to
the spot, took the dead body of 1-1'2 year old Nita and sent it for post mortem
examination. After the inquest, the police performed panchanama on the spot, J
examined the witnesses and registered the offence. The accused was arrested
c on completion of the investigation and charge-sheet was sent to the learned
Judicial Magistrate First Class, Pulgaon. The learned Magistrate committed
the case to the Court of Sessions at Wardha.
5. On perusal of the facts, it appears that wife Shanta has deposed that
the appellant killed his daughter Nita, who was only 1-112 years old, by
D strangling her. It has come in evidence that the appellant suspected the
fidelity of his wife Shanta and thought that Nita was not his child at all. There
had been differences between the husband and wife as a result of which she
was made to leave her husband's house, but Shanta returned to the appellant
after giving birth to her daughter Nita. The accused-appellant did not allow
her to feed her daughter Nita and ultimately on 1.1.1991 killed her by strangling
E her. We see no reason to disbelieve Shanta.
6. We have seen the post mortem report. There are injuries on the neck,
cheek and eyes of the child Nita and the doctor has given her evidence that
the probable cause of death might be due to asphyxia due to suffocation. We
see no reason to disbelieve the prosecution case as it is consistent with the
F medical evidence.
7. We have carefully gone through the evidence of Shanta. She is an
eye witness to the incident and thus there is direct evidence in this case. She
has stated that her husband was not allowing her to give milk and feed to
her child, Nita and her husband killed the child by pressing her neck. Her
G evidence is credible and also stood corroborated by the post mortem report
and other evidence on record. ....._
8. Thus, we see no reason to interfere with the impugned judgment of
the High Court. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
H D.G. Appeal dismissed.