Sukhdev Singh v. State of Haryana
DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. 1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment
of a learned Single Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissing
the appeal filed by the appellant. The appeal was filed by the appellant C
against the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge, Sirsa convicting him for
offence punishable under Section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic
Substances Act, 1985 (in short the 'Act') and sentencing him to undergo
imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000/- with default
stipulation.
2. Appeal before the High Court was disposed of in the absence of
learned counsel for the appellant. The order itself noticed that with the
assistance of learned counsel for the State, learned Single Judge perused the
records and delivered the judgment.
3. From the order of the High Court it appears that notice was issued
to the appellant for engaging another counsel as the High Court noticed that
he was not represented. It is noted in the order that there was no evidence
to show that the notice was served on the appellant or not, yet the High Court
disposed of the matter ex parte.
4. In support of the appeal, learned counsel for the appellant submitted
that no notice was received by the appellant regarding non-appearance of his
lawyer. In any event the lawyer who was earlier appearing had withdrawn form
the case without any intimation to the appellant.
5. Though several other points are raised in support of the appeal, it
is not necessary to refer to them. Since the High Court itself was not sure
whether notice was served or not, it should not have taken up the matter ex
parte. The matter is remitted to the High Court for fresh consideration on
merits expeditiously. As the matter is pending since long before the High
A Court. let the parties appear before the High Court without further notice on
16th July, 2007. The Hon'ble Chief Justice is requested to list the matter before
an appropriate Bench.
6. The appeal is disposed of accordingly.
B 7. In view of this order, no order is necessary to be passed m
Crl.M.P.No.4562 of2007.
RP. Appeal disposed of.
r