LexDraft · Judgments

Ashok Kumar v. State of N.C.T. of Delhi and Ors.

Supreme Court of India · 2007 INSC 692 · 2007

Coram: ARIJIT PASAYAT, P.P. NAOLEKAR

Source: sci_open_data

DR. ARIJIT PASA Y AT, J. Having heard the learned counsel for the respondent-State, we find that the conviction of the appellant cannot be maintained. It is to be noted that the co-accussed persons were acquitted of all the charges as evidence was not sufficient to substantiate the accusation. Additionally burden has been put on the accused-appellant to show as to B under what circumstances the death was caused. The presumption in such matters is relateable to a death occuring within seven years of marriage. Admittedly, the marriage in the present case was solemnised more than IO years before the date of occurrence. That being the position, the order of the High Court is not sustainable and the same is set aside. The appellant is C entitled to acquittal. The bail bonds of the accused executed for the purpose of bail in terms of the order dated 15.07.2002 shall stand discharged. The appeal is allowed. ,, D.G. Appeal allowed. D