Sachin v. the State of Maharashtra
Judgment
1. Leave granted.
2. We have heard learned counsel Ms. Sangeeta Kumar appearing
on behalf of the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee for
the appellant and Mr. Shrirang B. Varma, learned counsel for the
respondent-State at length.
Operative Portion of the Judgment:
3. It is noted that the appellant herein while initially subjected to
imprisonment of seven years has completed actual sentence of
eleven years and eight months. We have found that the orders of the
High Court and consequently, of the Special Court to be erroneous
and the same are liable to be set aside. In these circumstances,
Sachin v. The State of Maharashtra
the impugned judgment dated 26.02.2016 and subsequent orders
passed therein on 02.03.2016 as well as the order dated 08.03.2016
in Criminal Appeal No.30/2015 are set aside. Consequently, the order
of the Special Court dated 28.04.2016 passed in Special(POCSO)
Case No.5/2013 convicting and sentencing the appellant herein to
suffer life imprisonment and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default to
suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months is set aside.
4. Now, what follows is that the original judgment of the Special
Court convicting the appellant and imposing a sentence of rigorous
imprisonment for seven years survives. However, the unfortunate
reality is that in view of the impugned judgment and orders, the
appellant has undergone eleven years of actual sentence.
5. In the circumstances, we find that to do complete justice in the
matter, instead of remanding the Criminal Appeal No.30/2015 on the
file of the High Court, we exercise our powers under Article 142 of
the Constitution of India and restore the original sentence imposed
on the appellant herein which is seven years of imprisonment.
Since the appellant has completed eleven years and eight months
of incarceration i.e. a sentence more than that originally imposed
on him, we find that the ends of justice would be met if, instead of
rehearing his appeal on the original sentence, the matter is concluded
and the appellant is released from jail forthwith.
6. Consequently, the Criminal Appeal No.30/2015 pending on the file
of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay Nagpur Bench, Nagpur
is rendered infructuous and therefore, the same stands disposed of.
7. Ordered accordingly.
8. Resultantly, the respondent-State and Superintendent, Nagpur
Central Jail, Maharashtra are directed to release the appellant from
the jail forthwith.
9. The appeals are allowed and disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
Result of the case: Appeals Allowed.
†