The Commissioner, Religious and Charitable Endowments, Bangalore and Ors. v. Kasliyappa Gurukula Sri Vidya Shala

G Though the respondent has been served, he does not appear either in person or through counsel. Leave granted. Admittedly, the suit was filed in which the Government was set H ex-parte and an ex-parte decree was granted. Then the state filed an 246 .... COMMNR., RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS v. KG. SRI VIDYA SHALA 247 application to set aside the ex-parte decree on February 17, 1984 and that A petition was dismissed on the ground that the delay was not properly explained. The appeal was also dismissed by the High Court. The question is whether the State has properly given explanation for not filing the application to set aside the ex-parte decree within 30 days from the date of the knowledge. No notice required under s.80 CPC was B issued. In view of the fact that the office of the Government was informed on February 15, 1984, the Government must be deemed to have had notice of a parte decree from that date and within three days thereafter the application was filed. Therefore, there was no delay. The appeal is accordingly allowed. No costs. T.N.A. Appeal allowed.