Muthuswami Nadar and Ors. v. Ramakrishnan Nadar and Ors.

The following O_rder of the Court was delivered : This appeal at the instance of the plaintiffs has been directed against the judgment dated 16th December, 1986 passed by the High Court of Madras in Second Appeal No. 1977 of 1977, affirming the judgment of the first Appellate Court dated 9.9.1977 whereby the judgment and degree passed by the Trial Court were reversed. The plaintiffs-appellants had instituted the suit for partition of the suit land on the basis of the three Sale Deeds one of which is said to have been executed by Inkupillai and Muthupillai - sons of Perumal in respect of their shares, in favour of the third appellant. The two other Sale Deeds were executed by Rosammal and Mariammal, in favour of the first appellant and. the second appellant D respectively. The suit was resisted by the respondent on the ground that Rosammal and Mariammal did not inherit any interest in the land and, · 'f' therefore, Sale Deeds executed by them were invalid. The Trial Court on evaluation of the evidence took the view that the vendors of the plaintiffs had inherited an interest in the land in question and. therefore, the sales E effected by them were valid. These findings were reversed by the first Appellate Court on the assumption that Kochammal - the mother of Rosammal and Mariammal was a Christian and, therefore, she could not succeed to the property of Kumaraswami, her sons, who died as a Hindu. But on perusal of the pleadings of the parties, we find that the learned First Appellate Court had wrongly assumed that Kochammal - the mother of Rosammal and Mariammal had converted into Christianity. On the contrary, we find that it is an admitted fact that she was a Hindu till she died in the year 1957. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, on the death of G Kumaraswami on (23.7.1864) share of Kumaraswami devolved on his mother Kochammal, according to Mitakshara Law because, Kumaraswami died unmarried. After the death of Kochammal in the year 1957 succession to her property will be governed by the Hindu Succesion Act which came into force in 1854 and that being so, her two daughters will be entitled to H 14 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1995) SUPP. 6 S.C.R. A the property left by their mother because a. convert descendants only are disqualified under Section 20 of the Hindu Succession Act. In these facts and circumstances, sales effected by Rosammal ad Mariammal would be valid. In the result, the appeal succeeds and is hereby allowed. The judg­ ment and decree passed by the first Appellate Court and the High Court B are set aside and that of the Trial Court is restored. No costs. Substitution application is allowed. T.N.A. Appeal allowed.